Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Social Media Backlash: New York Gov. Kathy Hochul Mocked for Targeting 3D Firearm Printing

Listen to Article

New York Governor Kathy Hochul just stepped into a digital firing line she probably didn’t see coming. In a recent X post, the Democrat governor announced her grand plan to mandate that 3D printers sold in the Empire State come pre-loaded with software to block them from printing firearms. It’s the kind of top-down nanny-state decree that screams control louder than a suppressed AR-15, and social media users—especially the 2A crowd—pounced like wolves on a wounded elk. Memes exploded, with replies flooding her post calling it everything from techno-tyranny to printing press prohibition 2.0, drawing parallels to historical attempts to stifle innovation under the guise of safety. One viral quip? Next up: Software to block printers from making Kathy bobbleheads. The backlash isn’t just funny; it’s a masterclass in how everyday Americans are done with politicians treating them like children who can’t be trusted with a desktop fab lab.

Let’s peel back the layers on why this is such a clown show for gun rights advocates. First, the tech itself is laughably flawed—3D printing firearm parts has been around since Cody Wilson’s Liberator pistol dropped in 2013, and no software DRM has ever stopped determined tinkerers from sidestepping restrictions via open-source code, custom firmware, or even printing the blocker itself (meta, right?). Hochul’s proposal echoes failed efforts like California’s unserialized ghost gun bans, which courts have repeatedly gutted for violating the Second Amendment, as seen in recent rulings like *VanDerStok v. Garland* (2024), where the Fifth Circuit smacked down ATF overreach on DIY kits. Contextually, this lands amid New York’s already draconian gun laws—assault weapon bans, red flag seizures, and now printer policing—post-*Bruen* (2022), which demands historical analogs for restrictions. Good luck finding colonial precedents for software mandates on hobbyist tools, Kathy.

The implications for the 2A community? This is red meat for mobilization. It spotlights how anti-gun politicians are pivoting from metal guns to polymer ones, desperately clutching at digital straws as manufacturing democratizes. Expect lawsuits from groups like the Firearms Policy Coalition or Second Amendment Foundation, arguing it burdens the right to keep and bear arms by hobbling common tools (printers are used for everything from prosthetics to prototypes). For pro-2A folks, it’s a rallying cry: Share the memes, tag your reps, and keep printing—legally, of course. Hochul’s misstep just handed the community a viral win, proving that when you mock the people’s ingenuity, they mock you right back, louder and with better graphics. Stay vigilant, Second Amendment warriors; the ink’s not dry on this one yet.

Share this story