Rosie O’Donnell Says David Ellison Taking Over CNN Would Be ‘Tragic,’ Calls Jewish Bari Weiss a ‘Nazi’

August 19, 2026
4:32 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Rosie O’Donnell’s latest outburst—branding Jewish journalist Bari Weiss a “Nazi” and labeling David Ellison’s potential stewardship of CNN “tragic”—is less a coherent media critique than a window into the reflexive intolerance that now dominates one side of the culture war. O’Donnell’s rhetoric collapses the moment it’s examined: Weiss, who fled the New York Times after its newsroom turned on her for questioning progressive orthodoxy, is the antithesis of authoritarianism, while Ellison’s sin appears to be that he might steer a legacy outlet toward balance rather than activism. The irony is rich; the same voices that spent years decrying “misinformation” now equate viewpoint diversity with genocide. For the 2A community, the stakes are straightforward. A CNN under new management less beholden to the coastal monoculture could finally apply scrutiny to the Biden-era ATF’s pistol-brace rule, the pistol stabilizing brace reclassification, and the steady drip of “ghost gun” rulemaking that treats law-abiding owners as presumptive criminals. When legacy outlets treat every shall-issue reform or constitutional-carry expansion as a public-health crisis rather than a civil-rights development, the result is regulatory whiplash that chills FFLs and manufacturers. A shift in tone at CNN would not guarantee friendly coverage, but it would at least surface data—CDC defensive-gun-use estimates, John Lott’s research, or the FBI’s own active-shooter reports—that the current regime simply ignores. The deeper takeaway is that cultural institutions are not neutral arbiters; they are gatekeepers whose personnel choices shape which facts reach the public. O’Donnell’s tantrum is therefore a tell: any deviation from the script is treated as existential threat. Second Amendment supporters have learned this lesson the hard way through decades of “assault weapon” panic and the deliberate conflation of legal commerce with criminal violence. Whether the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal ultimately closes or not, the episode underscores why parallel media, independent platforms, and relentless primary-source scrutiny remain essential. The right to keep and bear arms is only as secure as the information environment that defends it.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community, the stakes are straightforward. A CNN under new management less beholden to the coastal monoculture could finally apply scrutiny to the Biden-era ATF’s pistol-brace rule, the pistol stabilizing brace reclassification, and the steady drip of “ghost gun” rulemaking that treats law-abiding owners as presumptive criminals. When legacy outlets treat every shall-issue reform or constitutional-carry expansion as a public-health crisis rather than a civil-rights development, the result is regulatory whiplash that chills FFLs and manufacturers. A shift in tone at CNN would not guarantee friendly coverage, but it would at least surface data—CDC defensive-gun-use estimates, John Lott’s research, or the FBI’s own active-shooter reports—that the current regime simply ignores.

The deeper takeaway is that cultural institutions are not neutral arbiters; they are gatekeepers whose personnel choices shape which facts reach the public. O’Donnell’s tantrum is therefore a tell: any deviation from the script is treated as existential threat. Second Amendment supporters have learned this lesson the hard way through decades of “assault weapon” panic and the deliberate conflation of legal commerce with criminal violence. Whether the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal ultimately closes or not, the episode underscores why parallel media, independent platforms, and relentless primary-source scrutiny remain essential. The right to keep and bear arms is only as secure as the information environment that defends it.

Share this story