Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Raskin: SCOTUS Went After Voting Rights Act ‘in the Name of’ Constitution, It’s Like End of Reconstruction

Listen to Article

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is drawing a dramatic parallel between the Supreme Court’s recent rulings and the end of Reconstruction, claiming on MSNBC’s The Last Word that justices demolished the Voting Rights Act in the name of the Constitution. He paints a picture of a nation sliding back into post-Civil War chaos, where federal protections for Black voters were gutted, allowing Southern states to impose Jim Crow laws unchecked. Raskin’s rhetoric isn’t subtle—it’s a full-throated alarm that SCOTUS is enabling a new era of voter suppression, equating originalist interpretations of the Constitution to the tools of segregationists. But let’s peel back the hyperbole: this stems from decisions like Shelby County v. Holder (2013), where the Court struck down a key VRA formula for preclearance as outdated, and more recent cases chipping away at race-based gerrymandering precedents. Raskin’s framing ignores how these rulings restore power to states under the 10th Amendment, a bedrock principle that safeguards federalism—not just for voting, but for everything from education to self-defense.

For the 2A community, Raskin’s Reconstruction analogy is a masterclass in slippery-slope fearmongering that gun owners know all too well. Just as he accuses SCOTUS of destroying voting protections to resurrect state-level oppression, anti-2A activists routinely invoke the same historical playbook: the post-Reconstruction Black Codes and Klan violence that disarmed freed slaves, leading to Heller’s explicit recognition of the right to bear arms for self-defense against tyranny. If Raskin sees constitutional fidelity as the death knell for minority rights, imagine his reaction to Bruen (2022), which dismantled interest-balancing tests and forced states to honor historical traditions—directly empowering red states to resist federal gun grabs. This mindset reveals the Left’s deeper discomfort with the Constitution’s original meaning, whether it’s voting maps or magazine capacities. It’s not about protecting the vulnerable; it’s about centralizing power in D.C., where unelected bureaucrats can override the people’s elected representatives.

The implications for 2A patriots are crystal clear: Raskin’s outrage signals escalating attacks on decentralized authority, the very federalism that shields our rights from coastal elites. As SCOTUS continues affirming text-and-history tests in cases like Rahimi or upcoming challenges to assault weapon bans, expect more end of democracy hysterics from Democrats. This is our cue to rally—highlight how the same Court that’s ending Reconstruction is fortifying the Second Amendment against modern Black Codes disguised as common-sense reforms. Stay vigilant; the battle for the Republic’s soul is fought on these constitutional fronts, and we’re winning because the Founders’ words endure.

Share this story