Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Padilla: Blanche Remains Trump’s Personal Attorney, That’s ‘Disqualifying’

Listen to Article

Sen. Alex Padilla’s claim that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is “disqualifying” because he still represents President Trump is the latest Washington parlor game dressed up as constitutional crisis. In reality, the Senate’s advice-and-consent role has never required nominees to sever every tie to the president who appointed them; if it did, the confirmation hearings of Attorneys General under both parties would be empty theaters. What Padilla is really objecting to is the prospect of an AG who might actually enforce federal law without treating the Second Amendment as a constitutional speed bump. For gun owners, that matters: an attorney general who understands that the right to keep and bear arms is not a loophole to be regulated out of existence could finally shift DOJ resources away from chasing lawful owners and toward prosecuting actual violent felons.

The deeper irony is that the same senators now clutching their pearls over Blanche’s client list spent the last four years celebrating an ATF that redefined pistol braces, frames, and “ghost guns” by regulatory fiat. Those rules were drafted by political appointees whose résumés included anti-gun litigation, yet no Democrat called their prior advocacy “disqualifying.” The 2A community has watched this double standard play out in real time—every new restriction framed as “common-sense,” every court loss labeled “extreme.” If Blanche’s continued relationship with Trump is the disqualifier, then the disqualifying pattern is the Senate’s willingness to confirm officials who treat the Bill of Rights as a list of suggestions rather than commands.

What this episode really signals is that the confirmation fight is no longer about qualifications; it is about whether the Department of Justice will remain an enforcement arm of the administrative state or return to its statutory lane. For Second Amendment supporters, the stakes are concrete: continued litigation over pistol braces, magazine capacity, and the pistol definition itself will be shaped by who sits in the AG’s chair. If the price of that shift is that the president’s lawyer keeps taking his calls, most gun owners will consider it a bargain rather than a scandal.

Share this story