Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

MS NOW’s O’Donnell: Media, Platner Endorsers Ignored Proof of His Abuse, Lies

▶
Listen to Article

Lawrence O’Donnell’s takedown on MSNBC exposed how the press and progressive backers manufactured a folksy, salt-of-the-earth image for Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner—an image that collapsed once evidence of his documented abuse and repeated falsehoods surfaced. The “humble oyster farmer” narrative was never organic; it was a deliberate media construct designed to shield a candidate whose record on personal conduct and credibility should have disqualified him from serious consideration. For Second Amendment supporters, the episode is a textbook reminder that the same outlets quick to brand rural Mainers as dangerous gun owners are equally willing to airbrush away red flags when the candidate aligns with their politics.

The damage isn’t limited to one race. When legacy media and activist donors conspire to launder a candidate’s past, they erode the public’s ability to judge fitness for office on the issues that matter most to gun owners—constitutional carry, protection against red-flag laws, and resistance to magazine bans. Platner’s defenders treated his personal failings as irrelevant distractions, yet those same voices routinely demand exhaustive scrutiny of any pro-2A candidate’s social-media history or hunting photos. The double standard is glaring and instructive: if the press will suppress evidence of abuse to protect one side, it will certainly suppress evidence of lawful gun ownership to attack the other.

The takeaway for the firearms community is straightforward. Every election cycle now features an arms race of narrative control, and 2A advocates cannot afford to outsource candidate vetting to outlets that view gun rights as a bug rather than a feature. Primary voters and grassroots donors must do the homework themselves—pulling police reports, campaign-finance filings, and old social-media posts—because the institutions that once performed that service have chosen sides. O’Donnell’s segment, however belated, at least confirms what many already suspected: the “humble oyster farmer” was a costume, and the costume is now in the shredder.

Share this story