Mike Collins Slams Jon Ossoff for Endorsing ‘Extremist’ Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Race

August 13, 2026
1:54 am

▶

Listen to Article

Rep. Mike Collins’ rebuke of Sen. Jon Ossoff lands like a warning shot across the bow of the Democratic Party’s leftward lurch. By spotlighting Ossoff’s decision to back Abdulrahman El-Sayed—an avowed socialist whose platform includes sweeping gun-control measures and a stated hostility to the Second Amendment—Collins is reminding voters that national Democrats are no longer content to nibble at the edges of the right to keep and bear arms. El-Sayed’s record in Michigan already includes support for “assault-weapon” bans, magazine restrictions, and red-flag laws that shift the burden of proof onto law-abiding owners; elevating him to the U.S. Senate would give those ideas a national megaphone and a vote in the chamber that confirms federal judges. For the 2A community, the stakes are straightforward: every Senate seat that flips to the left expands the coalition willing to treat the Second Amendment as a legislative bargaining chip rather than a constitutional command. Ossoff’s endorsement signals that even self-described moderates in purple states are now comfortable mainstreaming candidates whose policy wish-lists begin with the confiscation of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles. If El-Sayed-style politics become the price of admission to the Democratic caucus, expect renewed pushes for universal background checks tied to registration, expanded ATF rulemaking, and funding for state-level gun courts that operate on probable-cause-light standards. The larger implication is electoral as well as legislative. Collins’ critique frames the race as a referendum on whether Georgia voters want their senator empowering the most anti-gun wing of his party. That framing travels: in 2026 and beyond, any Democrat seeking statewide office will have to answer for which socialist or “democratic socialist” candidates they were willing to legitimize. The 2A grassroots now has an early, concrete target list—both the endorsers and the endorsed—and a ready-made contrast between constitutional originalists and those who view the right to bear arms as an obstacle to be managed rather than a liberty to be preserved.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community, the stakes are straightforward: every Senate seat that flips to the left expands the coalition willing to treat the Second Amendment as a legislative bargaining chip rather than a constitutional command. Ossoff’s endorsement signals that even self-described moderates in purple states are now comfortable mainstreaming candidates whose policy wish-lists begin with the confiscation of commonly owned semi-automatic rifles. If El-Sayed-style politics become the price of admission to the Democratic caucus, expect renewed pushes for universal background checks tied to registration, expanded ATF rulemaking, and funding for state-level gun courts that operate on probable-cause-light standards.

The larger implication is electoral as well as legislative. Collins’ critique frames the race as a referendum on whether Georgia voters want their senator empowering the most anti-gun wing of his party. That framing travels: in 2026 and beyond, any Democrat seeking statewide office will have to answer for which socialist or “democratic socialist” candidates they were willing to legitimize. The 2A grassroots now has an early, concrete target list—both the endorsers and the endorsed—and a ready-made contrast between constitutional originalists and those who view the right to bear arms as an obstacle to be managed rather than a liberty to be preserved.

Share this story