Kim Jong-un: ‘America First’ and ‘Zionism’ Require North Korea to ‘Exercise’ Its Nuclear Weapons Status

June 24, 2026
9:22 am

▶

Listen to Article

North Korea’s latest nuclear saber-rattling is a textbook reminder that authoritarian regimes treat civilian disarmament as a prerequisite for total control, and the Kim regime’s explicit linkage of “America First” and “Zionism” to its nuclear posture shows how quickly rhetoric can turn into real-world threats when only the state is armed. While Pyongyang’s propaganda is aimed at Washington and Jerusalem, the underlying message for Americans is unmistakable: a government that fears an armed populace will always seek to neutralize that threat, whether through confiscation at home or the threat of annihilation abroad. The 2A community has long argued that the Second Amendment is the ultimate check against both foreign aggression and domestic tyranny; Kim’s words underscore why an individual right to keep and bear arms remains the most practical deterrent to centralized power run amok. The regime’s decision to “thoroughly exercise” its nuclear status also highlights the dangerous asymmetry that exists when law-abiding citizens are stripped of effective means of self-defense while rogue states flaunt weapons of mass destruction. In the United States, every new restriction on magazine capacity, semi-automatic rifles, or carry rights incrementally shifts the balance of power toward the state and away from the people—the same dynamic Kim exploits when he equates American sovereignty with existential danger. Pro-2A advocates rightly point out that an armed citizenry not only preserves liberty at home but projects credible resolve abroad; history shows that nations and peoples who can defend themselves are far less likely to be targeted by expansionist dictators. For the firearms community, the takeaway is both strategic and philosophical: vigilance against incremental gun control is inseparable from vigilance against foreign adversaries who view American strength as an obstacle. Kim’s invocation of nuclear weapons as a counter to “America First” policies should stiffen resolve to protect the constitutional right that ensures the United States remains a nation of citizens rather than subjects, capable of deterring both domestic overreach and international blackmail.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

The regime’s decision to “thoroughly exercise” its nuclear status also highlights the dangerous asymmetry that exists when law-abiding citizens are stripped of effective means of self-defense while rogue states flaunt weapons of mass destruction. In the United States, every new restriction on magazine capacity, semi-automatic rifles, or carry rights incrementally shifts the balance of power toward the state and away from the people—the same dynamic Kim exploits when he equates American sovereignty with existential danger. Pro-2A advocates rightly point out that an armed citizenry not only preserves liberty at home but projects credible resolve abroad; history shows that nations and peoples who can defend themselves are far less likely to be targeted by expansionist dictators.

For the firearms community, the takeaway is both strategic and philosophical: vigilance against incremental gun control is inseparable from vigilance against foreign adversaries who view American strength as an obstacle. Kim’s invocation of nuclear weapons as a counter to “America First” policies should stiffen resolve to protect the constitutional right that ensures the United States remains a nation of citizens rather than subjects, capable of deterring both domestic overreach and international blackmail.

Share this story