Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Final Charge Dismissed in California Case Against Journalists Who Exposed Abortion Industry’s Fetal Body Parts Practices

Listen to Article

In a stunning victory for press freedom and truth-tellers everywhere, a California court dismissed the final charge against pro-life undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt on Wednesday, effectively ending a years-long legal witch hunt orchestrated by the abortion industry and its allies in the deep state. The duo from the Center for Medical Progress had heroically infiltrated Planned Parenthood and other providers in 2015, releasing raw, unedited videos that exposed the grisly reality of fetal body parts trafficking—clinics haggling over prices for intact baby livers, hearts, and brains like they were black-market auto parts. What followed was a predictable backlash: California Attorney General Kamala Harris, now a U.S. Senator and VP contender, weaponized the full force of the state to bury the story with 15 felony charges, including racketeering, despite the videos being authentic and protected speech. This dismissal isn’t just a win for Daleiden and Merritt; it’s a middle finger to the censorship machine that silences dissent.

Digging deeper, this case reeks of selective prosecution—journalists who exposed corruption get the book thrown at them, while actual baby killers and organ harvesters walk free. The charges were flimsy from the jump: no victims, no financial harm proven, just hurt feelings from an industry raking in billions. It’s a blueprint for how Big Abortion, Big Pharma, and Big Government collude to protect their racket, much like they’ve tried (and failed) to disarm law-abiding Americans who dare question their narratives. Enter the 2A angle: this saga mirrors the ATF’s lawfare against gun owners and manufacturers, from the Hughes Amendment scandals to the endless Bump Stock bans and pistol brace crackdowns. Just as rogue feds fabricate crimes to chill Second Amendment exercise, California’s AG twisted privacy laws into a gag order on First Amendment journalism. The parallels are uncanny—both are about preemptively disarming threats to the regime’s sacred cows, whether that’s baby parts or bearable arms.

The implications for the 2A community are crystal clear: if they can spend a decade railroading journalists over hidden cameras, imagine the hell they’ll unleash on concealed carriers or home defenders who threaten their gun-grab utopia. This dismissal is a rallying cry—every dropped charge weakens their prosecutorial bluff, reminding us that persistence and public pressure can dismantle even the most corrupt cases. Pro-2A warriors, take note: support outfits like CMP that punch up against the machine, because tomorrow’s raid could be on your door for owning fetal tissue trafficking accessories (i.e., AR-15s). Victory today, vigilance forever—keep fighting, or they’ll rewrite the rules while you reload.

Share this story