Exclusive — Ohio Democrat Who Voted Against DHS Funding: Americans ‘Expect Their Leaders’ to Keep Them Safe

May 1, 2026
5:36 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Rep. Greg Landsman (D-OH), fresh off voting Nay on two critical House measures tied to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding amid the longest shutdown of any U.S. federal agency in history, has the audacity to lecture Americans on public safety. In a statement dripping with irony, Landsman declared that citizens expect their leaders to keep them safe and take the issue seriously. This comes from a Democrat whose votes effectively starved DHS resources—resources that fund border security, counter-terrorism, and disaster response—leaving frontline agents underfunded and vulnerable. It's peak political theater: grandstand on safety while pulling the plug on the very agency tasked with delivering it. For the 2A community, this hypocrisy isn't just laughable; it's a flashing red warning light. DHS isn't some abstract bureaucracy—it's the tip of the spear against illegal immigration, cartel violence, and the flood of unvetted threats pouring across our southern border, many armed with smuggled firearms that end up in criminal hands stateside. Landsman's Nay votes echo the same playbook we've seen from gun-control zealots: defund law enforcement and security apparatuses, then pivot to blame law-abiding gun owners for the chaos they helped create. Remember, it's the same crowd pushing red-flag laws and assault weapon bans while sanctuary cities become no-go zones. This shutdown stunt amplifies the case for self-reliance—why trust politicians who sabotage federal protectors to suddenly champion your safety? The implications are stark: in an era of rising crime and border crises, 2A advocates must highlight these contradictions to expose the anti-safety underbelly of the Democrat agenda. Landsman's flip-flop isn't isolated; it's symptomatic of a party that prioritizes open borders and ideological purity over American lives. Pro-2A warriors, use this as ammo—share it, meme it, and remind voters that true security starts with a well-armed citizenry, not virtue-signaling votes that cripple our defenses. If leaders like Landsman won't fund the shields, we'll defend our own.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community, this hypocrisy isn’t just laughable; it’s a flashing red warning light. DHS isn’t some abstract bureaucracy—it’s the tip of the spear against illegal immigration, cartel violence, and the flood of unvetted threats pouring across our southern border, many armed with smuggled firearms that end up in criminal hands stateside. Landsman’s Nay votes echo the same playbook we’ve seen from gun-control zealots: defund law enforcement and security apparatuses, then pivot to blame law-abiding gun owners for the chaos they helped create. Remember, it’s the same crowd pushing red-flag laws and assault weapon bans while sanctuary cities become no-go zones. This shutdown stunt amplifies the case for self-reliance—why trust politicians who sabotage federal protectors to suddenly champion your safety?

The implications are stark: in an era of rising crime and border crises, 2A advocates must highlight these contradictions to expose the anti-safety underbelly of the Democrat agenda. Landsman’s flip-flop isn’t isolated; it’s symptomatic of a party that prioritizes open borders and ideological purity over American lives. Pro-2A warriors, use this as ammo—share it, meme it, and remind voters that true security starts with a well-armed citizenry, not virtue-signaling votes that cripple our defenses. If leaders like Landsman won’t fund the shields, we’ll defend our own.

Share this story