Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Dem Sen. Murphy: We Should ‘Unilaterally End the War’, Which ‘Probably Leaves Iran in Control of the Strait’

Listen to Article

Sen. Chris Murphy’s casual admission that a unilateral U.S. withdrawal from the Strait of Hormuz would “probably leave Iran in control” is the kind of strategic surrender that should set off alarm bells for every gun owner who understands how fragile energy markets—and therefore the entire domestic economy—really are. When a senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee shrugs off the prospect of Tehran dictating the flow of 20 percent of the world’s oil, he is also tacitly endorsing the same foreign-policy weakness that historically drives up the price of everything from ammunition to optics. Higher energy costs squeeze manufacturers, raise shipping rates for firearms and components, and ultimately price working Americans out of the very tools they rely on for self-defense and sport.

The deeper problem is the mindset: Murphy’s willingness to trade a vital maritime choke-point for political expediency mirrors the same anti-sovereignty logic that fuels domestic gun-control efforts. Both rest on the assumption that American strength—whether military projection or individual armament—is inherently provocative rather than stabilizing. History shows the opposite; credible deterrence, whether a carrier group in the Gulf or a law-abiding citizen with a Glock on his hip, prevents escalation far more reliably than retreat. If the senator’s prescription becomes policy, expect renewed calls to “do something” about “assault weapons” once pump prices spike and the public is told the only solution is more government control at home.

For the 2A community, the takeaway is straightforward: foreign-policy retreat and domestic disarmament are two sides of the same coin. A nation unwilling to secure its interests abroad will eventually decide it cannot trust its citizens to secure themselves at home. Keeping an eye on senators who treat strategic waterways like bargaining chips is therefore as important as tracking the latest magazine-ban bill—because both ultimately determine whether Americans will still be free to own the firearms that guarantee all other freedoms.

Share this story