Behar: Dems Have to Win Because Trump Is ‘Destroying Democracy’

July 10, 2026
8:13 pm

▶

Listen to Article

Joy Behar’s latest outburst on “The View” is the same tired script Democrats have been reading since 2016: if Trump wins, democracy dies. The claim is so shopworn that even the audience seems to be nodding off, yet it still serves its real purpose—keeping the base in a permanent state of panic so they never ask why the party’s actual record on guns, speech, and due process looks more authoritarian than anything Trump has done. By framing every election as an existential rescue mission, Behar and her colleagues sidestep the fact that the Biden-Harris years delivered record ATF rulemaking, pistol-brace bans, and quiet pressure on banks to de-bank lawful gun owners, all while lecturing the public about “threats to democracy.” For the 2A community the stakes are concrete, not rhetorical. Another Democratic administration would almost certainly revive the pistol-brace rule struck down in court, push universal background checks that function as de-facto registration, and lean on credit-card networks to flag firearm purchases. Trump’s first term, by contrast, produced two Supreme Court justices who helped deliver Bruen and the subsequent wave of permitless-carry and constitutional-carry victories in the states. The difference is not abstract theory; it is whether millions of Americans keep the ability to defend themselves without begging permission slips from the same officials who claim to be saving democracy. The real danger to self-government is not a president who tweets too much; it is the permanent bureaucracy and media apparatus that treat any electoral loss as proof the system is broken and therefore must be “fixed” by limiting the rights of the losing side. Behar’s warning is best read as an admission that Democrats intend to govern as though half the country is already disqualified from full citizenship—an attitude that has already produced campus speech codes, COVID-era church closures, and red-flag laws that bypass due process. The 2A community has learned the hard way that when one party claims a monopoly on democratic legitimacy, the first casualty is usually the Bill of Rights.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the 2A community the stakes are concrete, not rhetorical. Another Democratic administration would almost certainly revive the pistol-brace rule struck down in court, push universal background checks that function as de-facto registration, and lean on credit-card networks to flag firearm purchases. Trump’s first term, by contrast, produced two Supreme Court justices who helped deliver Bruen and the subsequent wave of permitless-carry and constitutional-carry victories in the states. The difference is not abstract theory; it is whether millions of Americans keep the ability to defend themselves without begging permission slips from the same officials who claim to be saving democracy.

The real danger to self-government is not a president who tweets too much; it is the permanent bureaucracy and media apparatus that treat any electoral loss as proof the system is broken and therefore must be “fixed” by limiting the rights of the losing side. Behar’s warning is best read as an admission that Democrats intend to govern as though half the country is already disqualified from full citizenship—an attitude that has already produced campus speech codes, COVID-era church closures, and red-flag laws that bypass due process. The 2A community has learned the hard way that when one party claims a monopoly on democratic legitimacy, the first casualty is usually the Bill of Rights.

Share this story