Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

pew report black

Hate ads?! Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Liberal Minneapolis City Council Members Say ‘No’ to Crime Fighting Grant for the Dumbest Reason

Listen to Article

Minneapolis City Council members just turned down a federal grant that would have put more cops on the street and funded crime-fighting initiatives, and their stated reason is almost too on-the-brand to be believed: they’re worried the extra officers might actually arrest people. In a city still reeling from smash-and-grab crews, open-air drug markets, and the highest carjacking rate in a generation, the progressive majority framed the money as a threat to “community-led” solutions—code for continuing the same policies that produced a 50-plus-percent spike in violent crime after 2020. The grant wasn’t even about guns; it was about basic patrol staffing and overtime, yet the council treated it like an existential threat to their post-George Floyd experiment in managed decline.

For the 2A community the lesson is straightforward: when progressive cities deliberately hollow out proactive policing, armed citizens become the last line of defense between order and chaos. Law-abiding Minnesotans who once relied on a visible police presence now face longer response times and de-policed neighborhoods where criminals operate with near-impunity. That environment accelerates permit-to-carry applications, drives training-class waitlists, and pushes more residents to exercise their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The council’s decision doesn’t just fail the law-abiding poor who suffer most from rising violence; it tacitly endorses a two-tier system in which only those willing and able to defend themselves enjoy any realistic expectation of safety.

Nationally, the Minneapolis episode is a warning shot. If the same ideological reflex against “criminalizing poverty” spreads to other blue cities, expect another wave of shall-issue reforms, campus-carry expansions, and state preemption battles as citizens demand the tools progressive governance refuses to provide. The right to bear arms isn’t just about hunting or sport; it’s increasingly about filling the security vacuum created when elected officials prioritize slogans over statistics. Minneapolis just made that case more vividly than any op-ed could.

Share this story