Is The New Benelli M2-G1 Better Than The Beretta 1301? Yes

August 16, 2026
11:00 pm

▶

Listen to Article

The Benelli M2-G1’s arrival isn’t just another tactical shotgun launch; it’s a direct challenge to the Beretta 1301’s long-held reputation as the go-to semi-auto for serious defensive and competition use. Where the 1301 earned its following with a lightweight inertia system and a price that undercut the high-end Benelli SBE3, the new M2-G1 appears to close that gap by marrying the proven M2 platform’s durability with a refined gas system that tames recoil without adding the bulk shooters associate with older gas guns. That matters in a market where milliseconds and ounces count—whether you’re clearing a stage or clearing a hallway—and the M2-G1’s tweaks suggest Benelli studied exactly where the 1301’s ergonomics and aftermarket ecosystem gave it an edge. For the broader 2A community, this isn’t merely a product-versus-product debate; it’s a reminder that innovation still flows fastest when civilian demand drives it. Both shotguns exist because millions of Americans rejected the notion that defensive tools should be slow, heavy relics, and manufacturers responded with modern materials, improved controls, and optics-ready receivers. The M2-G1’s debut also underscores how quickly the inertia-versus-gas argument can shift when a company listens to end-users who actually train instead of theorize. If Benelli’s execution matches the early claims, the 1301’s crown may slip—not because the Beretta suddenly became inadequate, but because competition keeps forcing every design to justify its price and its place in the gun safe. That pressure benefits everyone who values an armed citizenry. When two Italian giants trade blows in the tactical shotgun space, the result is lighter weight, faster follow-ups, and more choices for the private citizen who refuses to settle for whatever the lowest bidder supplies to government contracts. The M2-G1 versus 1301 showdown is therefore less about brand loyalty and more about the marketplace proving, once again, that the Second Amendment’s practical strength rests on continuous improvement rather than static tradition.

Best FFL Software Ranked and Compared!

For the broader 2A community, this isn’t merely a product-versus-product debate; it’s a reminder that innovation still flows fastest when civilian demand drives it. Both shotguns exist because millions of Americans rejected the notion that defensive tools should be slow, heavy relics, and manufacturers responded with modern materials, improved controls, and optics-ready receivers. The M2-G1’s debut also underscores how quickly the inertia-versus-gas argument can shift when a company listens to end-users who actually train instead of theorize. If Benelli’s execution matches the early claims, the 1301’s crown may slip—not because the Beretta suddenly became inadequate, but because competition keeps forcing every design to justify its price and its place in the gun safe.

That pressure benefits everyone who values an armed citizenry. When two Italian giants trade blows in the tactical shotgun space, the result is lighter weight, faster follow-ups, and more choices for the private citizen who refuses to settle for whatever the lowest bidder supplies to government contracts. The M2-G1 versus 1301 showdown is therefore less about brand loyalty and more about the marketplace proving, once again, that the Second Amendment’s practical strength rests on continuous improvement rather than static tradition.

Share this story