Hate ads?! Want to be able to search and filter? Day and Night mode? Subscribe for just $5 a month!

Adam Smith’s 1780 Letter Shows He Saw Tariffs as a Tool to Improve Industry

Listen to Article

Adam Smith, the Enlightenment economist whose *Wealth of Nations* is practically the Bible of free-market capitalism, dropped a bombshell in an 1780 letter that flips the script on his supposed laissez-faire purism. Far from being a die-hard opponent of all government intervention, Smith advocated for a whopping 50% tariff on foreign goods to supercharge British manufacturing. He argued it would shield fledgling domestic industries from cheaper imports, allowing them to scale up, innovate, and eventually compete globally—essentially using protectionism as a temporary scaffold to build economic muscle. This wasn’t blind mercantilism; it was pragmatic strategy, recognizing that raw free trade could kneecap infant industries before they even walked.

Context matters here: In the late 18th century, Britain was industrializing amid cutthroat competition from established European powers and colonial rivals. Smith’s tariff pitch was tailored to steel the empire’s edge, much like how Alexander Hamilton later championed American tariffs in his *Report on Manufactures* to bootstrap U.S. industry against British dominance. He wasn’t anti-tariff across the board—*Wealth of Nations* critiques excessive ones but endorses them strategically for national security and self-reliance. This nuance shreds the myth of Smith as a no-holds-barred globalist, revealing a thinker who balanced markets with sovereignty.

For the 2A community, this is red meat: Just as Smith saw tariffs as a tool to nurture domestic production and deter foreign dependency, modern protectionism echoes the Founders’ vision of an armed, self-sufficient citizenry insulated from globalist erosion. Think about it—import restrictions on foreign arms and components (hello, surging tariffs on Chinese gun parts) mirror Smith’s playbook, bolstering American manufacturers like those producing AR-15s and 1911s. It fortifies supply chains against sanctions or embargoes, ensuring the Second Amendment stays ironclad. In an era of BRICS threats and supply disruptions, Smith’s wisdom screams: Protect your industrial base, or watch your sovereignty get tariffed into oblivion by adversaries. Pro-2A patriots should cheer this—free markets thrive when they’re free from foreign sabotage.

Share this story